Healthcare News
Articles, Jobs and Consultants for the Healthcare Professional
Home      View Jobs     Post Jobs     Library     Advertise     Plan Financials     About     Subscribe     Contact    
Erica Erman, Attorney, Dickinson Wright PLLC

2024 Revisions to 42 CFR Part 2: Key Changes, Impact, and Compliance Tips



By Erica Erman
Attorney
Dickinson Wright PLLC



See all this Month's Articles

Original Publish Date: August 6, 2024

On February 8, 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) finalized revisions to 42 CFR Part 2. Read on to learn more about Part 2, the changes, and helpful practice pointers.

Quick Refresher: What Is Part 2?

42 CFR Part 2 is a set of Federal laws that house the Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records regulations. Part 2 stringently limits the use and disclosure of patients’ substance use and alcohol use disorder records.

Who Needs to Pay Attention to Part 2?

Part 2 applies not only to “Part 2 Programs” but also to any lawful holder of Part 2 data, which can include, as examples, third-party payors and contractors, anyone who receives Part 2 data with the patient’s written consent and the required prohibition on redisclosure notice, administrative entities, auditors and evaluators. As a rule of thumb, if you have Part 2 data—whether you created that data or are in receipt of that data— you should assume you are obligated to protect that Part 2 data.

What Is New? A Few Highlights:

Reminder of What Has Not Changed:

When Did the New Rules Take Effect?

The final rule took effect this April 2024, and compliance is required by mid-February 2026.

Why the Change?

HHS has finalized revisions to Part 2 as mandated under the CARES Act. The revisions aim to bring Part 2 into alignment with HIPAA, and to facilitate SAMHSA’s initiative to (1) facilitate care coordination, with the goal of reducing the burdens on Part 2 protected information so patients can get help faster; and (2) to reduce dual compliance obligations for regulated entities.

Helpful Definitions:

You can find the commentary and final rule language here.

About the Author: Erica Erman is an attorney in the Phoenix, Ariz. office of Dickinson Wright PLLC. She focuses her practice on behavioral health care and the intersection of municipal laws with health care regulations. Erica’s work includes administrative hearings, HIPAA compliance, Stark and AKS regulations, state licensing, contract drafting, and health care transactions. Drawing from her experience litigating state and federal False Claims Act cases, Erica also provides counsel on the Parity Act and psychiatric urgent care. She can be reached at mailto:eerman@dickinsonwright.com.